- Your IDiyas USPTO weekly Patent trends and update
- Posts
- IDiyas Inventors Newsletter January 28 2025
IDiyas Inventors Newsletter January 28 2025
Why Copycats Cash In: The Surprising Economics of Imitation

For the Inventor, By the Inventor.
See this week's breakthrough USPTO patent grants!
Interested in sponsoring this newsletter: Learn more here
New to IDiyas? Join 37,813 intellectually curious readers Subscribe Here!
There’s a reason 400,000 professionals read this daily.
Join The AI Report, trusted by 400,000+ professionals at Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. Get daily insights, tools, and strategies to master practical AI skills that drive results.
Table of Contents
This Week's Patent News:
Bacardi's Legal Setback Over 'Havana Club' Trademark
On January 24, a federal court in Virginia ruled against Bacardi in its ongoing dispute with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) concerning the "Havana Club" trademark. The court dismissed Bacardi's lawsuit challenging the USPTO's decision to renew the trademark for Cubaexport, a Cuban government entity. Bacardi plans to appeal the decision, arguing that the USPTO disregarded established law and regulations.Federal Circuit Upholds Sanctions for Bad Faith Patent Litigation
The Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to impose sanctions on PS Products Inc. for filing meritless patent lawsuits in incorrect venues. The court emphasized that district courts have inherent authority to impose sanctions for bad faith conduct, highlighting the importance of proper venue selection in patent cases.Trading Technologies Petitions Supreme Court Over Patent Law Issues
Trading Technologies (TT) has petitioned the Supreme Court to review a Federal Circuit decision, raising significant questions about patent law and civil procedure. The case stems from TT’s patent infringement suit against IBG LLC and Interactive Brokers LLC over patents related to electronic trading user interfaces.The European Commission may file a WTO complaint against the UK over the Lenovo vs. Ericsson case. Lenovo's appeal for an interim license from Ericsson will be urgently heard on February 18, 2025. If Lenovo wins, it could lead to significant international legal implications, including further disputes and potential trade complaints. The article highlights the impact of extraterritorial patent rulings and the need for a balanced global solution to avoid endless legal conflicts.
UPC’s Dusseldorf LD assumes long-arm jurisdiction over UK part of EPO-granted patent. The Dusseldorf Local Division (LD) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has ruled that it has jurisdiction over the UK parts of EPO-granted patents if the defendant is domiciled in a UPC contracting state. This decision could make Dusseldorf an attractive venue for patent cases involving multiple jurisdictions.

Why Copycats Cash In: The Surprising Economics of Imitation
From Risk to Reward: How Imitators Turn Innovation into Profit. While innovation garners applause, imitation often secures the payday.
The Economics of Imitation: Why Copying Often Outpaces Creating Innovation is often celebrated as the engine of economic progress, but history and market dynamics suggest that imitation can be a more lucrative strategy. | ![]() |
From the replication of groundbreaking ideas to the refinement of existing technologies, imitators frequently outperform innovators financially. The reasons are rooted in the lower costs, reduced risks, and strategic advantages associated with imitation, which allow companies to capitalize on existing demand and proven ideas.
The Cost of Innovation
Innovation is expensive. Developing a novel product or service requires substantial investment in research and development (R&D), talent acquisition, prototyping, and testing. Moreover, innovators need more certainty, as the market may not adopt their ideas. Thomas Edison, often heralded as the quintessential inventor, once remarked, “I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.” For every success story, there are countless failed attempts to replicate groundbreaking ideas that rarely see a return on investment.
In contrast, imitators bypass the expensive trial-and-error phase. By studying market-proven innovations, they can replicate the concept with minor tweaks, avoiding the steep upfront costs. For example, Samsung's swift adaptation of smartphone technologies pioneered by Apple enabled it to dominate the global market share, while Apple bore the brunt of initial R&D expenses.
Risk and Reward: The Innovator's Dilemma
Innovators must contend with a paradox: their groundbreaking ideas often pave the way for imitators to profit. Clayton Christensen’s "The Innovators Dilemma" highlights how market leaders can often lose out to competitors who refine or copy their innovations more efficiently. While innovators focus on creating a market, imitators concentrate on scaling and optimizing.
The pharmaceutical industry is a case in point. Innovators spend billions developing new drugs, navigating regulatory hurdles, and marketing their products. However, once patents expire, generic manufacturers step in, producing the same medications at a fraction of the cost. Generics, as imitators, often capture significant market share without the burden of initial development expenses.
Speed to Market: The Imitator's Advantage
Imitators benefit from the innovator's groundwork, particularly in consumer education. Apple introduced the iPod in 2001, revolutionizing portable music. Yet, competitors like Microsoft (Zune) and Creative Zen quickly released their versions, benefitting from Apple's market-building efforts. Even though the iPod maintained dominance, competitors profited without educating consumers about the product's value.
Similarly, fast fashion companies like Zara and H&M thrive by imitating high-end fashion trends. These companies monitor runway shows, replicate designs, and deliver affordable versions to consumers within weeks. High-end designers may claim the creative spotlight, but imitators reap the financial rewards by catering to mass markets.
Intellectual Property Challenges
While patents and trademarks offer some protection for innovators, these barriers are not impenetrable. Imitators often find legal loopholes or operate in jurisdictions where law enforcement of intellectual property (IP) could be more assertive. This phenomenon is particularly evident in technology and software, where code, designs, and algorithms are complicated to protect completely.
China’s rapid economic ascent offers a striking example. Chinese companies have mastered the art of imitation, from consumer electronics to e-commerce platforms. They have created global powerhouses like Huawei, Alibaba, and Tencent by learning from and improving upon Western innovations. These firms began as imitators but now dominate their respective industries, demonstrating how imitation can evolve into innovation over time.
Refining the Product
Imitation is not limited to direct copying; it often involves refinement. Imitators learn from the shortcomings of the original and deliver a superior product. Facebook, for example, was not the first social media platform. MySpace and Friendster preceded it. However, Facebook improved upon its models, introducing better features and a more user-friendly interface, which ultimately led to its dominance.
Similarly, Toyota did not invent the automobile, but by adopting and refining production techniques introduced by Henry Ford, it revolutionized manufacturing with its lean production system. Today, Toyota is one of the most profitable car manufacturers globally, owing its success to optimizing existing innovations.
The Business Case for Imitation
While innovation remains essential for societal progress, the financial rewards often accrue disproportionately to imitators. By leveraging lower costs, reduced risks, and market insights provided by innovators, imitators frequently achieve greater profitability. This dynamic challenges the conventional narrative that originality is the ultimate path to success. Instead, as history and economics reveal, when executed strategically, imitation can be even more lucrative than innovation.
The lesson for entrepreneurs and businesses is clear: while innovation garners applause, imitation often secures the payday.
Trivia
What percentage of inventors in the United States are women?
Please scroll to the bottom of this newsletter to find out.
Featured Inventor
Dr. Trammell is a professor in the Department of Physics and Optical Science at UNC Charlotte, where she has been a faculty member since 1996. She earned her Ph.D. in Astronomy from the University of Texas at Austin in 1994 and a B.S. in Physics with Highest Honors from the UNC Chapel Hill in 1989. Her research focuses on biomedical optics, including imaging and spectroscopy for biomedical applications, mid-IR/thermal imaging in medicine, surgical navigation, image-guided surgical interventions, and biopreservation. | ![]() |
In recognition of her innovative patented work, Dr. Trammell placed third in the world-wide competition for the Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (PMU)-National Academy of Inventors International Patent Award on December 12, 2024. Honored at a ceremony in Al-Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, she was recognized for her patent “Methods and compositions for biopreservation.” This groundbreaking method, which uses an amorphous matrix for precise drying and temperature control, is critical for preserving sensitive biological samples. Its applications span the medical and pharmaceutical industries, biotechnologies, research, and agriculture, demonstrating the wide-reaching impact of her work.
Among her honors, she has received the ISBER 2023 Best Paper Award and the Bonnie Cone Fellowship at UNC Charlotte in 2007. She is a member of prominent organizations such as SPIE, the American Astronomical Society, and the International Astronomical Union.
Dr. Trammell’s research has advanced biomedical optics and fostered innovation with practical applications that improve public health and support economic development. Through her teaching and mentorship, she continues to inspire the next generation of scientists and innovators.
Today in Patent History
On January 28, 1868, Amariah Hills of Hockanum, Connecticut, revolutionized lawn care with the first U.S. patent for a reel-type lawn mower. While this wasn’t the first-ever lawn mower, credit for that goes to Edwin Beard Budding, an English engineer who patented his version in 1830. Hills brought practical improvements to the design, making it more user-friendly for the average American. | ![]() Reel-type lawn mower - Patent No. 73807 |
Looking to start the new year with better sleep?
Cornbread Hemp’s Sleep CBD Gummies offer a melatonin-free solution for a great night’s sleep! USDA organic and melatonin-free, these gummies help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer. Grab a jar today and save 30% on your first order with code RESOLUTION at checkout.*
*One-time purchases only, cannot be combined with subscription discounts.
Introducing New Data Products and Enhancements
![]() Compound Keyword Analytics Our Premium members on average have 253 patents. | ![]() |
IDiyas is the world’s largest resource for celebrating and supporting inventors. Become a member of the IDiyas Inventor Membership Program to foster the community of innovation – locally and globally. Access millions of inventors and patents, and connect through networking and engaging events. Join today to enjoy exclusive benefits with our limited-time membership offer.

Centurion Patentors
Congratulations to last week's Centurion Patentors!
We are excited to welcome the following inventors into these prestigious patent clubs:

For more info about their research & patents, click here
Trivia
The answer is:
~21%
Recommendations
Get the Most Out of Your Amazon Prime Membership
Maximize the value of your Amazon Prime membership by uncovering 10 lesser-known benefits that can transform your shopping, streaming, and saving experience.
Reply